جداسازی یرسینیا و سالمونلا از سگ و گربه ‏های به ظاهر سالم در تهران، ایران

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی- انگلیسی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد باکتری شناسی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، ایران

2 استاد باکتری شناسی، دانشگاه شهرکرد، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: حیوانات خانگی مانند گربه و سگ منبع بالقوه انتقال آلودگی به انسان، به ویژه کودکان هستند. آن‏ها حامل عوامل بیماری‏های مشترک دستگاه گوارش هستند که می‏توانند به صاحبانشان منتقل شوند. باکتری‏های یرسینیا و سالمونلا همواره به عنوان عامل بیماری‏زای کودکان در نظر گرفته شده‏اند. این مطالعه به منظور بررسی میزان شیوع عفونت در سگ و گربه‏های به ظاهر سالم در شهر تهران در ایران انجام شده است.

مواد و روش‏‏ ها: در مجموع 100 نمونه سواب مدفوع سگ و گربه با روش  Multiplex PCR با پرایمرهای اختصاصی برای تشخیص گونه‏های یرسینیا و سالمونلا بررسی شد.

نتایج: 15 نمونه (4 گربه و 11 سگ) از نظر یرسینیا و 20 نمونه (9 گربه و 11 سگ) از نظر سالمونلا مثبت بودند. در نتیجه میزان شیوع یرسینیا 8 درصد در گربه و 22 درصد در سگ و میزان شیوع سالمونلا 18 درصد در گربه‏ها و 22 درصد در سگ تخمین زده شد.

بحث و نتیجه ‏گیری:با توجه به نتایج حاصل میزان شیوع یرسینیا و سالمونلا در 8 تا 22 درصد از حیوانات خانگی بدون هیچ گونه علایم بالینی تشخیص داده شد. مواد غذایی آلوده حیوانات ممکن است منبع اصلی عفونت باشد. نتایج حاصل در برنامه‏ریزی روش‏های کنترل و پیشگیرانه می‏تواند مفید باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Detection of Yersinia spp and Salmonella spp. in apparently healthy cats and dogs in Tehran, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shabnam Hashemi 1
  • mohamadreza mahzounieh 2
  • mahvash ghorbani 1
1 M.Sc. of Bacteriology, Shahrekord University, Iran
2 Professor of Microbiology, Shahrekord University, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Companion animals, such as cat and dog, are potential sources of transmissible diseases to humans, especially children. They harbor zoonotic agents in gastrointestinal tracts as carriers which are capable of infecting their owners. Salmonella and Yersinia bacteria are considered as frequent causes of illness in children. This study was aimed at finding out the prevalence rate of infection in apparently healthy dogs and cats in Tehran, Iran.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 rectal swabs from dogs and cats were analyzed by a multiplex PCR method with specific primers for detection of Yersinia and Salmonella species.

Results: Fifteen samples (4 cats and 11 dogs) were positive for Yersinia and 20 samples (9 cats and 11 dogs) were positive for Salmonella. So the prevalence rate of Yersinia was 8% in cats and 22% in dogs and the prevalence rates of Salmonella were 18 and 22% in cats and dogs respectively.

Discussion and conclusion: According to the results, Yersinia and Salmonella were detected in 8- 22% of pet animals without any clinical signs. The contaminated animal foods may be the main source of infection. These results may be useful in planning control and preventive programs. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Salmonella
  • Yersinia
  • Dog
  • Cat
  • Iran

Introduction

Since companion animals are treated as members of the family and live in common environment with human, they may be an important reservoir of zoonotic diseases (1). In many parts of the World, household pets have been found to play a direct role in transmitting zoonosis (1). Although the precise proportion of human diseases for which pets are specifically responsible is largely unknown, more than 70 pathogens of companion animals are known to be transmissible to people (2). Contact with animals has been clearly confirmed as a risk factor to transmit pathogens. For some pet species, their role in human disease has been more clearly identified. Pet animals such as cats and dogs, are potential sources of transmissible agents for humans specially children, such as Yersinia and Salmonella spp. bacteria. Two species include Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica are important agents for humans. Yersinia enterocolitica can cause yersiniosis in humans and animals as well. The predominant symptom in humans, particularly in young children, is diarrhea (3). Secondary immunologically induced sequelae, such as reactive arthritis, are not uncommon, especially in HLA- B27- positive individuals. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis causes sporadic and epidemic infections in humans and is widely distributed among domestic pets (4- 8), farm animals (7), and wild animals (7, 9 & 10). Pets such as dogs and cats may become a source of infection with Y. pseudotuberculosis, since they are infected with this organism during the cold months and excrete up to 104 cells per mass of feces expressed in gram (4- 5). Although Salmonella may be found in environment, common species of Salmonella (except S. Typhi) usually have an animal reservoir that shed bacteria without any clinical sign and symptoms. Animal contact transmission of microorganisms by pets accounts for 15- 20% of total cases of Salmonella infections (11). The agent can be transmitted by direct or indirect contacts. Patients at high risk for pet- transmitted salmonellosis are infants and young children, and immunocompromised persons such as HIV positive individuals. Patients suffered from malignancy or hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell anemia disease are also at risk of salmonellosis. People can get infected when they eat food or drink water or milk, but they can be transmitted by infected pets such as rodents, cats, dogs and rabbits in contacts (12- 13). In this study, we try to find out the prevalence rate of infection among apparently healthy dogs and cats in Tehran, Iran.

 

Materials and methods

Fecal samples isolation: A total of 100 fecal samples collected from dogs and cats (50 cats and 50 doges) that referred to small animal veterinary clinics in Tehran, Iran. These samples were collected from animals without clinical signs.

DNA extraction: Total DNA was extracted from 200 µl of sample with i-genomic CTB DNA extraction mini kit (Intron, South Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 200 µl of samples suspensions was incubated with 200 µl lysis buffer and 10 µl proteinase K at 65°C for 30 min. After incubation, 250 µl of binding buffer and 250 µl of ethanol 80% were added to the lysate. The samples were then washed following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Nucleic acid was eluted with 50 µl of elution buffer provided in the kit. DNA was extracted from sample without cultivation.

PCR: The nucleotide sequences of invA gene in Salmonella and ompF gene in Yersinia were detected by a developed Multiplex PCR method, that amplify a 428 bp for Yersinia and 263 bp for Salmonella PCR amplicons (Table 1 (14- 15)). The Taq DNA polymerase 2X master mix red (Ampliqon, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used in all amplification reactions. PCR amplification was carried out in 25 µl reaction volumes as follows: 12.5 µl master mix, 0.5 µl of each primer (10 mM), 9.5 µl dobble distilled water and 2 µl of template DNA. All amplification reactions were performed in a PCR Express thermal cycler (BioRad) as follows: 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 61°C for 1 min and 72°C for 30 Sec, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels containing Rima sight DNA stain. The electrophoresis was run for 20 min at 100 V, and the gels were photographed under ultraviolet illumination.

 

 

Table 1: Primer sequencesused for identifying Yersinia spp and Salmonella spp.

Primers Name

Nucleotide sequence 5’- 3’

Product size

Annealing tepmrature

227Fmod

Yersinia spp

669R

GTCTGGGCTTTGCTGGTC

GCGTCGTATTTAGCACCAACG

428 bp

61°C

Sal spp- R

Salmonella spp

Sal spp- F

GTGAAATTATCGCCACGTTCGGGCAA

TCATCGCACCGTCAAAGGAACC

263 bp

 

 

Fig 1- Agarose gel electrophoresis of Yersinia ompF gene and Salmonella invA gene.
 1, 2 Yersinia positive, 3, 4 Salmonella positive, 5, 6 both Yersinia and Salmonella positives.


 

 

Results

Fifteen samples (4 cats and 11 dogs) showed 428 bp PCR product that were positive for Yersinia and 20 samples (9 cats and 11 dogs) showed 263 bp PCR product that were positive for Salmonella. Some samples were positive for both Salmonella and Yesinia (Fig. 1). So the prevalence rate of Yersinia spp. was 8% in cats and 22% in dogs and the prevalence rates of Salmonella spp. were 18 and 22% in cats and dogs respectively.

 

Discussion and conclusion

Keeping a pet at home is a huge responsibility. There are several factors regarding ethics including animal rights and welfare, health care, regular check- ups by the veterinarian and precautionary measures. If the owner neglects his/ her responsibilities, it may encounter dangerous consequences in contact with persons and public health (16).

In many parts of the world, companion pets have played a direct role in transmitting zoonoses (1). Animal- transmitted diseases are very important because some of them are frequent and unfortunately they are always unrecognized. So they may shed the pathogenic agents via secretions and transmit them to humans.

Infectious gastrointestinal diseases affect man and animals throughout the world. Certain etiologic agents (e.g. Salmonella spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Yersinia enterocolitica, Cryptosporidia, Strongyloides stercoralis, Echinococcus granulosa) seem to have the potentiality to be transmitted from pets to humans, causing severe disease in the latter.

Diarrhea is the most common cause of deaths in developing countries. Every year 12 million child death and 5 million related cases to diarrheal diseases are reported according to WHO documents (17). Infectious diarrhea may be caused by many pathogens, but E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, and Y. enterocolitica are the most important bacterial agents (18).

Yersinios is the third zoonotic bacterial disease in Germany and other countries of the Union of Europe. It is one of the five main bacterial gastrointestinal diseases of humans. Beside pigs, companion animals, especially dogs and cats, were frequently source of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica (19).

Salmonellosis was the second most often reported zoonotic disease in humans in 2008.

According to the results, Yersinia and Salmonella were found in 8- 22% of pet animals without any clinical signs. The contaminated animal foods may be the main source of their infection.

Previously in Italy in 1986, Nastasi et al isolated five Salmonella and one Y.enterocolitica from 212 dog feces (20). In another study in 2013, Stamm et al tested a total of 4,325 fecal samples from dogs and 2,624 samples from cats, they isolated Y. enterocolitica strains from 198 (4.6%) of the dog and 8 (0.3%) of the cat fecal samples (21).

Individuals at higher risk of infections were frequently present among pet- owning house- holds, regardless of species. With few exceptions, house- holds with members at higher risk for infectious disease and those who recalled having received education on pet- associated disease risks followed similar practices to households without these individuals or education. Targeted educational efforts are indicated for households with individuals at higher risk of infections and those with high- risk species (22).

Transmission of diseases to man is usually complex, requiring close contact with pets or their excretions and frequently involves a breach of sound hygienic practice. It is also necessary to prevent feeding raw meat to animals.

This report offers a consensus opinion on the diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and control of the primary enteropathogenic bacteria in dogs and cats, with an emphasis on Yersinia and Salmonella.

Further research is needed to determine the reasoning behind household infection control and husbandry practices and the respective roles of education and perceptions in shaping these practices.

These findings are useful to optimize the identification and management of enteropathogenic bacteria in dogs and cats and prevalent to be illness in men.

 

(1) Kornblatt AN., Schantz PM. Veterinary and public health considerations in canine roundworm control. A survey of practicing veterians. American Veterinary Medical Law Association 1980; 233 (10): 1212- 15.

(2) Weese JS., Fulford MB. Companion Animal Zoonoses. The Canadian veterinary Journal. 2011; 53 (3): 316.

(3) Bottone EJ. Yersinia enterocolitica: overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes and Infection 1999; 1 (4): 323- 33.

(4) Fukushima H., Nakamura R., Iitsuka S., Ito Y., Saito K. Presence of zoonotic pathogens (Yersinia spp., Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., and Leptospira spp.) simultaneously in dogs and cats. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1985; 181 (3- 5): 430- 40.

(5) Fukushima H., Nakamura R., Iitsuka S., Tsubokura M., Otsuki K., Kawaoka Y. Prospective systematic study of Yersinia spp. in dogs. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984; 19 (5): 616- 22.

(6) Mair NS., Harbourne JF., Greenwood MT., White G. Pasteurella pseudotuberculosis infection in the cat: two cases. Veterinary Record 1967; 81 (4): 461- 2.

(7) Tsubokura M., Otsuki K., Kawaoka Y., Maruyama T. Characterization and pathogenicity of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from swine and other animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984; 19 (6): 754- 6.

(8) Yanagawa Y., Maruyama T., Sakai S. Isolation of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis from apparently healthy dogs and cats. Microbiology and Immunology 1978; 22 (10): 643- 6.

(9) Bercovier H., Brault J., Barre N., Treignier M., Alonso JM., Mollaret HH. Biochemical, ecological, and phage typing characteristics of 459 Yersinia strains isolated from a terrestrial ecosystem. Current Microbiology 1978; 1 (6): 353- 7.

(10)            Fukushima H., Gomyoda M., Shiozawa K., Kaneko S., Tsubokura M. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection contracted through water contaminated by a wild animal. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988; 26 (3): 584- 5.

(11)            Cohen ML., Potter M., Pollard R., Feldman RA. Turtle- associated salmonellosis in the United States. Effect of public health action, 1970 to 1976. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1980; 243 (12): 1247- 49

(12)            Lappin MR. Feline zoonotic diseases. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 1993; 23 (1): 57- 78

(13)            Peter G. Red Book: Report of the Committee of Infectious Diseases. 23th ed. Elk Grove. 1L:American Academy of Pediatrics; 1994.

(14)            Ginocchio C., Curtiss R., Gyles CL. Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 1992; 6 (4): 271- 9.

(15)            Stenkova AM., Isaeva MP., Rasskazov VA. Development of a Multiplex PCR Procedure for Detection of Yersinia Genus with Identification of Pathogenic Species (Y. pestis, Y. pseudotuberculosis, and Y. enterocolitica). Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology 2008; 23 (3): 119- 25

(16)            William A., Chaudharti SUR., Atsanda NN. Prevalence of some diseases of dogs and cats at the State Government Veterinary Clinic in Maiduguri- Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 2002; 22 (2): 568- 9.

(17)            Velayati AK., Ghazi Saidi K., Travati MR. A study of Salmonella, Shigella and Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli serotypes in acute gastroenteritis children under the age of five. Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran 1987; 1 (4): 22- 31.

(18)            Torres ME., Pírez MC., Schelotto F., Varela G., Parodi V., Allende F., et al. Etiology of children's diarrhea in Montevideo, Uruguay: Associated pathogens and unusual isolates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39 (6): 2134- 9.

(19)            Stamm I., Hailer M., Depner B., Kopp PA., Rau J. Yersinia enterocolitica in diagnostic fecal samples from European dogs and cats: identification by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and matrix- assisted laser desorption ionization- time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2013; 51 (3): 887- 93.

(20)            Nastasi A., Massenti MF., Scarlata G., Mammina C., Calcò C., Villafrate MR. Salmonella and Yersinia enterocolitica in soil and dog faeces. Bollettino dell'Istituto sieroterapico Milanese 1986; 65 (2): 150- 2.

(21)            Stamm I., Hailer M., Depner B., Kopp PA., Rau J. Yersinia enterocolitica in diagnostic fecal samples from European dogs and cats: identification by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and matrix- assisted laser desorption ionization- time of flight mass spectrometry.Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2013; 51 (3): 887- 93.

(22)            Willard MD., Sugarman B., Walker RD. Gastrointestinal zoonoses. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 1987; 17 (1): 145- 78.